Check out the TB2K CHATROOM, open 24/7               Configuring Your Preferences for OPTIMAL Viewing
  To access our Email server, CLICK HERE

  If you are unfamiliar with the Guidelines for Posting on TB2K please read them.      ** LINKS PAGE **



*** Help Support TB2K ***
via mail, at TB2K Fund, P.O. Box 71, Coupland, TX, 78615
or


OT/MISC Rush Limbaugh: O’Reilly Departure Was Not ‘Natural’ — It was a ‘Campaign’
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    4,781

    Rush Limbaugh: O’Reilly Departure Was Not ‘Natural’ — It was a ‘Campaign’

    Breitbart
    by Pam Key20 Apr 2017


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egvQkhJ9Nj0

    Thursday on his nationally syndicated radio show, conservative talker Rush Limbaugh called Bill O’Reilly’s departure from the Fox News Channel a “campaign,” and not a “natural” event.

    Limbaugh pointed to the origin of the story, which was first published in The New York Times and how it may have something to do with an internal struggle of “corporate intrigue” within Fox News.

    Partial transcript as follows:

    Why do The New York Times break the story? Out of the blue, they want to do a story on O’Reilly and Fox with whatever number of payouts to women. Where’d this come from? Nothing just comes out of the ether folks. They are not sitting there over at the New York Times waiting for ideas to pop into their head and then one second some reporter, ‘You know what I think I’m going to do a story on what a sexual harasser Bill O’Reilly is.’ That is not how it happens.

    The reason that it starts in The New York Times is important is because the second aspect is the corporate intrigue that I mentioned that is also behind this. It is — I don’t work there so there is no quicksand —but there is a battle for power going on there between sons of Rupert Murdoch and Rupert. And they are not conservatives my friends. In fact, they are — what is the generation before millennials? X? Their friends are all liberal, their wives. One of their wives works for the Clinton Global Initiative. One of the wives when this New York Times story, ‘You can’t keep the man on the air you just can’t this is embarrassing. It’s embarrassing to us, it’s embarrassing to dad company. You can’t do this.’ And the fact that the story ran on The New York Times was such a profound shock, sadness, and embarrassment that they felt that had to do something. That is why the fact that is started on The New York Times is crucial. There is two reason it is important. The Times is not just appearing out of nothing out of the ether.

    Here’s the timeline, story New York Times. How long did it take before you started hearing about massive advertiser defections, just a day, right? You think that was natural? No, this was a campaign, folks. That’s why this is so frustrating to me, even after all this time, these campaigns are not immediately spotted for what they are. Therefore, people are not able to deal with them. And this one should have been expected given what’s been going on the last two years there. Tey should have been ready for this. But see the bottom line is they were.

    Fox is not going to be the way it is for long. There is a massive –shakeup coming, and it is generational. It is generational and political. It is like anything else, nothing ever is constantly the same, there is change everywhere. But it has been amazingly easy to sit from a distance and watch this, it’s amazing how easy it appears, at least to me, that this massive and rapid transformation is occurring.

    http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/...ural-campaign/

    Like I posted on another thread.....the lib's win another one.
    A 1965 To The Present Dime Is Worth $.10 Today.
    A 1964 To The Present Dollar Bill Is Worth $1.00 Today.
    A 1964 Or Earlier Silver Dime Is Worth Over $1.25 Today.

    A lie told often enough becomes the truth - Lenin

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Over there
    Posts
    4,827
    I've never been a fan of O'Reilly, I found him to be arrogant. However it could have been a campaign to get rid of him. He never got a trial, he was accused and punished without due process. He only lost his face on the camera. He signed a multimillion dollar contract recently so money wise he's doing okay. I hope the bitches get nothing. He'll retire comfortably.
    Proud to be Deplorable, Irredeemable, a Scumbag and a bigot! Nothing wrong in being any of them.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    State WA
    Posts
    11,418
    I agree Bardou and yes we saw leftists were doing their best to smear him. I am sure Hannity will be next. . One of the women that said he stared at her. What?
    Watch who you look at folks.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by BetterLateThanNever View Post
    Breitbart
    by Pam Key20 Apr 2017


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egvQkhJ9Nj0

    Thursday on his nationally syndicated radio show, conservative talker Rush Limbaugh called Bill O’Reilly’s departure from the Fox News Channel a “campaign,” and not a “natural” event.

    Limbaugh pointed to the origin of the story, which was first published in The New York Times and how it may have something to do with an internal struggle of “corporate intrigue” within Fox News.

    Partial transcript as follows:

    Why do The New York Times break the story? Out of the blue, they want to do a story on O’Reilly and Fox with whatever number of payouts to women. Where’d this come from? Nothing just comes out of the ether folks. They are not sitting there over at the New York Times waiting for ideas to pop into their head and then one second some reporter, ‘You know what I think I’m going to do a story on what a sexual harasser Bill O’Reilly is.’ That is not how it happens.

    The reason that it starts in The New York Times is important is because the second aspect is the corporate intrigue that I mentioned that is also behind this. It is — I don’t work there so there is no quicksand —but there is a battle for power going on there between sons of Rupert Murdoch and Rupert. And they are not conservatives my friends. In fact, they are — what is the generation before millennials? X? Their friends are all liberal, their wives. One of their wives works for the Clinton Global Initiative. One of the wives when this New York Times story, ‘You can’t keep the man on the air you just can’t this is embarrassing. It’s embarrassing to us, it’s embarrassing to dad company. You can’t do this.’ And the fact that the story ran on The New York Times was such a profound shock, sadness, and embarrassment that they felt that had to do something. That is why the fact that is started on The New York Times is crucial. There is two reason it is important. The Times is not just appearing out of nothing out of the ether.

    Here’s the timeline, story New York Times. How long did it take before you started hearing about massive advertiser defections, just a day, right? You think that was natural? No, this was a campaign, folks. That’s why this is so frustrating to me, even after all this time, these campaigns are not immediately spotted for what they are. Therefore, people are not able to deal with them. And this one should have been expected given what’s been going on the last two years there. Tey should have been ready for this. But see the bottom line is they were.

    Fox is not going to be the way it is for long. There is a massive –shakeup coming, and it is generational. It is generational and political. It is like anything else, nothing ever is constantly the same, there is change everywhere. But it has been amazingly easy to sit from a distance and watch this, it’s amazing how easy it appears, at least to me, that this massive and rapid transformation is occurring.

    http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/...ural-campaign/

    Like I posted on another thread.....the lib's win another one.
    Who the heck is writing for Breitbart these days? Read that slowly and find all the conjugation and punctuation mistakes. Tsk tsk.
    If you need something, ask God. If you don't, thank Him.

  5. #5
    End Times News Report has a good video on the matter.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HjZQgAUNBs

    The guy had a long history. His employers had already paid out millions to get other victims to shut up. It was getting expensive. One woman taped his advances - not like it is all hearsay. Gross. I'd hate to have to work around some creep like that!

    Good riddance. I hope he looses everything.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    My beloved SW Missouri
    Posts
    8,061
    O'Reilly was an anti-2nd Amendment LibTurd... His behavior toward women, would have had him flogged- or met in the street, in generations past... He deserves far worse than he got... The wringing of hands, and gnashing of teeth at the dismissal of this douche bag, is disgusting... People like him, as media darlings, think themselves above the law... They are sociopaths, and should be removed from the limelight... Glad the bastard is gone...

    GBY&Y's

    Maranatha

    OldARcher
    "Confess with your mouth, that 'Jesus is Lord,' believing in your heart that God raised Him from the Dead, and you will be saved, for with the heart, man believes and is justified, and with his profession of faith, he is saved." Romans 10:9-10.
    I can either read God's Word to you, or read it over you. Your choice. Either way, you will meet Jesus Christ. Condition "0," Code Red to Black- ALWAYS.
    Trump Supporter and Proud Founding Member of The Nowski Brigade- To the Hilt!!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    7,476
    I could never stand to listen to him. He is the most arrogant and opinionated idiot I have ever heard! I do hope this is not the start of them taking down the Conservatives however. I just don't know what to think. I won't miss him but they had better not mess with Hannity!!

  8. #8
    One of the few things I can thank a liberal for. Thanks Hoppalong and the rest of you.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    31,835
    Quote Originally Posted by OldArcher View Post
    O'Reilly was an anti-2nd Amendment LibTurd... His behavior toward women, would have had him flogged- or met in the street, in generations past... He deserves far worse than he got... The wringing of hands, and gnashing of teeth at the dismissal of this douche bag, is disgusting... People like him, as media darlings, think themselves above the law... They are sociopaths, and should be removed from the limelight... Glad the bastard is gone...

    GBY&Y's

    Maranatha

    OldARcher
    THis^^^ Well said sir!
    People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance but that is common amongst those who have never accomplished anything in their lives and who have always played it safe not willing to risk failure.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    HI
    Posts
    2,945
    http://youtu.be/O_HyZ5aW76c
    Sorry don't know why it won't post a YouTube.

    I know people that worked with him, he was no Saint
    Money & power corrupt people, he thought he was untouchable.
    God Bless Us & God Bless America!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Central Illinois..halfway between here and there.
    Posts
    8,749
    Quote Originally Posted by sssarawolf View Post
    I agree Bardou and yes we saw leftists were doing their best to smear him. I am sure Hannity will be next. . One of the women that said he stared at her. What?
    Watch who you look at folks.
    No kidding! And people made fun of Pence when he said that he would never be alone with a woman who was not his wife. Just good common sense.
    Needs more cowbell.
    "The Constitution only gives people the right to persue happiness. You have to catch it yourself." --Benjamin Franklin
    Proud member of fly-over country

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    2,343
    The problem begins when the talking heads get to the point where they think the news and the network coverage is about them.......and not about what they are either reporting..... or in the case of a commentary stating an opinion on.......

    Personally, I found the guy to be a bore and never watched much of his stuff as a result....the more these talking heads all try to be chic/hip or cool in various ways the more they end up coming off as twits to me.........

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Faroe View Post
    End Times News Report has a good video on the matter.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HjZQgAUNBs

    The guy had a long history. His employers had already paid out millions to get other victims to shut up. It was getting expensive. One woman taped his advances - not like it is all hearsay. Gross. I'd hate to have to work around some creep like that!

    Good riddance. I hope he looses everything.
    My opinion as well.

    IMO he was more liberal than conservative.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    CO Mountains
    Posts
    4,247
    i dont think fox would dump his so fast if there was not a pile of crap coming their way over covering for him. how many payoffs over the years to shut women up? he became a liability and they cleaned house. good. cover ups always come out one way or another,. he was an embarrassment,

    tho it to me is More embarrassing they let him stay and kept covering up and paying off for him. now, it they can get rid of that smirking self important puffer fish shep smith...............
    ++++++++++++++++++++
    There is Only Jesus--no other worthy of honors or prayers or devotion. There is No Other.

    Cannabis Cancer Medicines Recipes http://cannacancerblog.wordpress.com

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    S. Texas
    Posts
    8,989
    Quote Originally Posted by OldArcher View Post
    O'Reilly was an anti-2nd Amendment LibTurd...
    That alone had always been enough for me to write him off...

    - Shane

    THE GOOD NEWS ABOUT NUCLEAR DESTRUCTION!
    WHAT TO DO IF A NUCLEAR DISASTER IS IMMINENT!
    When An ill Wind Blows From Afar! (Overseas Fallout)

    "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them;
    the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences."
    - Proverbs 22:3

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    W. Georgia
    Posts
    5,380
    Yet Geraldo stays. Remember the sicko posted this picture of himself online.

    http://www.clevescene.com/scene-and-...nd-this-summer

    I feel sexually assaulted, quick get me a lawyer.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    right here
    Posts
    3,914
    Quote Originally Posted by OldArcher View Post
    O'Reilly was an anti-2nd Amendment LibTurd... His behavior toward women, would have had him flogged- or met in the street, in generations past... He deserves far worse than he got... The wringing of hands, and gnashing of teeth at the dismissal of this douche bag, is disgusting... People like him, as media darlings, think themselves above the law... They are sociopaths, and should be removed from the limelight... Glad the bastard is gone...

    GBY&Y's

    Maranatha

    OldARcher
    All true, he led the "folks" down the rino lane.
    Under a Texas starry night sky sat a cowboy, a Muslim and an Indian. The Indian said, “Once we were
    many. But now we are few.” The Muslim grinned and said, “Once we were few. But now we are many!” The Texas cowboy spat into the fire and said, “That's cuz we ain't played cowboys and moslems yet!”

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Happy on the mountain
    Posts
    48,129
    http://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=10080

    The Demise of Fox News
    Posted on April 20, 2017
    78

    News brings word that the SJW’s have bagged their biggest trophy to date. Bill O’Reilly is the most popular cable news talker in the business and he was just fired for making the girls cry. It is all part of what is looking like a well orchestrated effort to break Fox News on the wheel of political correctness. The screeching harpies knocked out Roger Ailes and now they have taken out the top star, all via the same method – powerskirts claiming to have been done wrong by the knuckle-dragging misogynists running the network.

    The claim will be that the advertisers demanded Fox fire O’Reilly, but that is complete nonsense. Cable channels, like Fox News, exist on subscription revenues, not advertising dollars. FNC gets $1.50 from every cable home each month. That’s roughly $1.8 billion a year whether people watch or not. Their ad revenue is less than a third of that number. In the case of ESPN, for example, ad revenue is around one billion, and they have an audience about ten times the size of a cable news operation, even Fox News.

    An advertiser boycott could certainly harm the bottom line for Fox, but there is another reality to the cable business. Those companies demanding their ads be pulled from the O’Reilly show would still be running ads on other Fox programs. The reason they choose to run ads on Fox News is they believe there are people watching Fox News who will also buy crap they see advertised. Bill O’Reilly could be strangling kittens on his show. If he gets a valuable audience to watch, advertisers will want to get their name on his show.

    The reality is Fox could weather the storm and ride out this thing if they wanted to do it, but they probably have another agenda. It’s tempting to assume that Fox is stuffed to the rafters with right-wing ideologues, but that’s not the case. Fox is just as Prog infested as every other media company.This could very well be part of an effort to make the channel more Prog friendly. It could also be the dream-child of someone in management, to remake the network to appeal to younger, gayer viewers.

    Logic says that languishing networks like CNN would jump at the chance to land a huge fish like O’Reilly. Put the Big Mic on CNN in his old time slot and CNN would soon pass Fox in the ratings. In fact, they could put some other popular names around him and dominate the cable news wars. People like tabloid news shows and guys like O’Reilly are good at being just outrageous enough to get your attention, but not so crazy as to make you feel bad for liking tabloid news.

    That’s not going to happen, of course. CNN has the same economics as Fox News. They can fully engage in whatever politics they choose, because they get paid even if no one bothers watching. They are tax farmers, relying on an oligopoly to enforce their right to skim a buck a month from your cable bill. It’s why cable bills are over $100 per month and it is also why cord cutting is the new thing. If people could pick the channels they buy through their cable subscription, all of the cable news guys would go away.

    As an aside, it is one of the ironies of socialism. The economic philosophy that claims to favor equality of outcomes always turns into a vehicle for self-dealing by the advocates of socialism. American media is universally liberal, and financed by the socialism of cable television. Colleges and universities are madhouses of Progressive jackassery, financed by the socialized student debt system. American health care is looking like a cynical bust-out because of socialist economics championed by the Left.

    As a further aside, the companies pulling their ads from O’Reilly were not doing it for economic reasons. The ratings were through the roof and few Americans care about who is playing grab ass with whom at the TV station. These companies were pulling their ads in order to curry favor with the Cult. In many cases, their management teams are infested with Progs and powerskirts too. It’s like a virus for which there is no known cure. It controls the host and will bring about its demise in order to promote the cause.

    Anyway, a good lesson to recall in all of this is the story of Time Magazine. Henry Luce*founded the magazine, as well as Life, Sports Illustrated and other famous publications. He was also involved in radio, newsreels and eventually television. His company was the first multimedia corporation. In his heyday, he was considered the most influential private citizen in the country. The reason for that is his publications reached almost every American. He was an arbiter of the news.

    Luce was also rabidly anti-communist and regularly used his media outlets to do battle with the Progs of his day. He opposed most of what FDR tried to do in office. It was Luce who came to the rescue of Whittaker Chambers, when the the Progs had him at the top of their enemies list. Chambers worked for Luce, not only earning a paycheck, but writing for his publications. Luce helped Bill Buckley get started, thus helping the post-war conservative movement come to life. Henry Luce’s media empire was anti-Left.

    It was not, however, explicitly right-wing. After Luce died, his media company was slowly infiltrated by lunatics. By the 60’s it was unrecognizable. By the 70’s it was fully refashioned into a weapon of the Left. Even though its over the top Progressive bias slowly killed its circulation, the people running it did not care. What mattered was promoting the one true faith, even if it destroyed the institution from which it was broadcast. Time Magazine is gone now and the Luce company exists in name only.

    That’s the fate of Fox News. Rupert Murdoch was never a man of the Right. He was just a guy who loved tabloid news and was a genius at making money on modern media properties. His kids are Kool-Aid drinking Prog loonies, who will piss away the family fortune trying to buy status within the Cult of Modern Liberalism. As a result, Fox News will slowly be converted into a megaphone for the one true faith. We’ll sooner see a trans gender-fluid lesbian of color in prime time than another Bill O’Reilly type.

    Posted in Badder Thoughts, Culture | 78 Replies
    The wonder of our time isn’t how angry we are at politics and politicians; it’s how little we’ve done about it. - Fran Porretto
    -http://bastionofliberty.blogspot.com/2016/10/a-wholly-rational-hatred.html

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Happy on the mountain
    Posts
    48,129
    https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=83f_1492824257

    Bill O'Reilly Accuser Perquita Burgess Speaks Out | The View
    ================

    Also at https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=l20GDLfuV44

    Couldn't find a transcript.....
    The wonder of our time isn’t how angry we are at politics and politicians; it’s how little we’ve done about it. - Fran Porretto
    -http://bastionofliberty.blogspot.com/2016/10/a-wholly-rational-hatred.html

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    NW WI
    Posts
    3,105
    His designated replacement ,Tucker Carlson,will start Monday the24th in O'rielly's time slot.
    His 1st interview will be with Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner.

    GGK
    "You want your bubbles in your champagne glass , not in your portfolio. "
    THE DAILY PFENING

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Area 51
    Posts
    615
    Quote Originally Posted by Rabbit View Post
    Yet Geraldo stays. Remember the sicko posted this picture of himself online.

    http://www.clevescene.com/scene-and-...nd-this-summer

    I feel sexually assaulted, quick get me a lawyer.
    Maybe Gloria Allred is free. I'm sure she could help you.
    “Whether you think you can, or you think you can't—you're right.” ― Henry Ford

    “The whole secret of a successful life is to find out what is one's destiny to do, and then do it.” ― Henry Ford

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


NOTICE: Timebomb2000 is an Internet forum for discussion of world events and personal disaster preparation. Membership is by request only. The opinions posted do not necessarily represent those of TB2K Incorporated (the owner of this website), the staff or site host. Responsibility for the content of all posts rests solely with the Member making them. Neither TB2K Inc, the Staff nor the site host shall be liable for any content.

All original member content posted on this forum becomes the property of TB2K Inc. for archival and display purposes on the Timebomb2000 website venue. Said content may be removed or edited at staff discretion. The original authors retain all rights to their material outside of the Timebomb2000.com website venue. Publication of any original material from Timebomb2000.com on other websites or venues without permission from TB2K Inc. or the original author is expressly forbidden.



"Timebomb2000", "TB2K" and "Watching the World Tick Away" are Service Mark℠ TB2K, Inc. All Rights Reserved.