Check out the TB2K CHATROOM, open 24/7               Configuring Your Preferences for OPTIMAL Viewing
  To access our Email server, CLICK HERE

  If you are unfamiliar with the Guidelines for Posting on TB2K please read them.      ** LINKS PAGE **



*** Help Support TB2K ***
via mail, at TB2K Fund, P.O. Box 24, Coupland, TX, 78615
or


Space Weather/Sun Spot
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 81 to 91 of 91
  1. #81
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Swimming in sea quarks
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by packyderms_wife View Post
    Shinman Takezo is that you???
    ??? Who is that??? I'm pretty sure your not referring to the Ronan by that name.
    Facts?? We don't need no stinkin facts...

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    33,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Rayku View Post
    I've researched the electric universe idea extensively. That name came up in the research.
    From one of his videos;

    Parse that out a moment. If your answer isn't coming up with bovine excrement your not done parsing. Primer doesn't meet the definition for a theory by a long shot. You have to stretch the definition of hypothesis to make it fit.
    Now try to find information on 'David Lapoint', any degrees, associations, etc. Bottom line is, electric universe is demonstrably BS. Here are some of the EU claims;

    *Einstein's postulates are wrong.
    *General relativity is wrong.
    Atomic clocks on gps and other satellites have to account for relativity. The same for probes sent throughout the system. Someone may quibble with finner details of GR, but its effects have been proven empirically.

    *The Universe is not expanding.
    Red shift (moving away) and blue shift (moving towards) of light from stars to our system along with direct observations from hubble etc have proven that idea false.

    *The electric force travels faster than the speed of light with near-infinite velocity.
    Speed of electrical charges passing through a medium can in fact be measured.

    *Gravity has two poles like a bar magnet; dipole gravity.
    That gets into serious woo woo realm with no physical or mathematical proof.

    *Planets give birth to comets.
    Between NASAs deep impact, ESA rosetta missions, and a myriad of spectrometry observations the composition of comets has been established. They did not, nor could not have come from a planet.

    *Stars do not shine because of internal nuclear fusion caused by gravitational collapse. Rather, they are anodes for galactic discharge currents.
    Spectrometry of our sun, samples from solar wind, and a host of other evidence says that's BS.

    *Impact craters on Venus, Mars and the Moon are not caused by impacts, but by electrical discharges.The same applies to the Valles Marineris (a massive canyon on Mars) and the Grand Canyon on Earth.

    Shoemaker levy 9 impact, impacts on mars, the moon, and even here on earth have been directly or video graphically observed. Impact craters here have yielded multiple meteor fragments. This is one of the more egregious lines of BS they try to sell.

    I could go on for a month of Sundays on this. Whomever this Lapoint is, tried to build on what Thornhill and Talbott put out for the EU idea.

    People are free to make up their own minds, but I do wish they'd at least try to use them first.




    What LaPoint did is show how things work and its simple and elegant in its simplicity. There are a good number of astrophysicists that have accepted this theory. The primer field theory made sense and it also explains a few things they have tried to come up with a reasonable explanation for but nothing seemed to fit or was just not right.

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Swimming in sea quarks
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by Publius View Post
    What LaPoint did is show how things work and its simple and elegant in its simplicity. There are a good number of astrophysicists that have accepted this theory. The primer field theory made sense and it also explains a few things they have tried to come up with a reasonable explanation for but nothing seemed to fit or was just not right.
    We will have to agree to disagree.
    http://www.primercube.com/how-it-works/
    That was the whole point of his effort. To cash in on pseudoscience imo.
    I would be curious to know who these astrophysicists are?
    Facts?? We don't need no stinkin facts...

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    33,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Publius View Post
    I'm not checking every day, but we have gone two days with out sunspots. That last Micro sunspot should even be counted as a sunspot.



    We racked up another 5 days bringing the offical total to 100 spotless day to the year 2017. Mind you this looks like another micro sunspot that back during the maunder minima Mr. Maunder would be able to see with his 1 1/2" telescope.

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    33,614
    We are back to a spotless sun again and with only two days left to the year 2017.
    The total count is now 102 spotless days and looks like it will make 104.

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    33,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Publius View Post
    We are back to a spotless sun again and with only two days left to the year 2017.
    The total count is now 102 spotless days and looks like it will make 104.


    Ok; the official total spotless sun day's count for 2017 is 104. This current stretch that just started just 3 days ago and continues on into the new year 2018, only time will tell how this round will go.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    33,614

    7 Starting the Year 2018.

    Looks like it went 6 days before a new sunspot showed up and 4 days into the new year 2018, it may goi one one or two days before we go back to spotless again.

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    33,614
    We've gone one day spotless making five spotless day for the year 2018 and if it keeps up at the pace it was the last half of 2017 we may end up with close to 182 spotless days.

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    33,614
    New sunspot and only went two days spotless.

  10. #90
    It's not a very impressive sunspot. :

  11. #91
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Swimming in sea quarks
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by Pinecone View Post
    It's not a very impressive sunspot. :
    It would not have been counted prior to orbital telescopes.
    Facts?? We don't need no stinkin facts...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


NOTICE: Timebomb2000 is an Internet forum for discussion of world events and personal disaster preparation. Membership is by request only. The opinions posted do not necessarily represent those of TB2K Incorporated (the owner of this website), the staff or site host. Responsibility for the content of all posts rests solely with the Member making them. Neither TB2K Inc, the Staff nor the site host shall be liable for any content.

All original member content posted on this forum becomes the property of TB2K Inc. for archival and display purposes on the Timebomb2000 website venue. Said content may be removed or edited at staff discretion. The original authors retain all rights to their material outside of the Timebomb2000.com website venue. Publication of any original material from Timebomb2000.com on other websites or venues without permission from TB2K Inc. or the original author is expressly forbidden.



"Timebomb2000", "TB2K" and "Watching the World Tick Away" are Service Mark℠ TB2K, Inc. All Rights Reserved.