
Originally Posted by
Dennis Olson
This was a group of blacks, taking the law into their own hands and moving forward with a group mentality to beat an individual white man nearly to death.
That's true enough, but now we have no idea how provocative the man's actions had been in times past. had he threatened the kids before? Had he brandished a weapon at them before? Was he know in the neighborhood as an outspoken racist? The problem with the man's history is that now there is doubt as to whether or not the "mob" felt justification in what they did. Lord knows, we've talked often enough on the forum about how "Well, if I was the parent of the kid that had xxxx happen to them, I'd have beat the perp to within an inch of his life." And we always get a chorus of "HELL YEAH!" in replies.
So I can't say at this point whether or not this guy "got what was coming to him." Maybe he did. Maybe it was a race attack on the part of the blacks. But there's enough uncertainty now that I won't say EITHER side was "more right" than the other...
In principle I fully concur.
But in reality if Owens was black and the crowd white his record would mean precisely nothing. He could be a convicted rapist, murder, and child molester and it would still be a hate crime perpetrated by whitey.
I can’t speak for others but this is what sticks in my craw.
"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
Protesting is like scratching a chalk board. It annoys but produces nothing of substance.
Bookmarks